Dubious Gyaan from Mr. Salman Khurshid

 

Dubious Gyaan from Mr. Salman Khurshid




One can always depend on an old Congress neta to shoot off some nonsense from atop his high-horse of privilege. This time it is none other than Salman Khurshid who has compared political Hindutva with Boko Haram and the Islamic State in his new book Sunrise over Ayodhya. Boko Haram shot into fame in 2014 after kidnapping 276 schoolgirls from a government school in Nigeria. And the Islamic State is famous for its trademark public beheadings which number more than 200 to date. By comparing political Hindutva with the Boko Haram and Islamic State, Khurshid has exposed his failure to understand the true nature of political Hindutva.

The single point of distinction is that political Hindutva has climbed from 2 seats in the parliament to more than 300 seats. And this climb was never an easy one for them. In 1996 Atal Bihari Vajpayee led a government for a mere 13 days and resigned after failing to prove majority. He was succeeded by H.D. Deve Gowda who led the United Front. This in turn collapsed after the Congress Party withdrew its support. Thus, the country was pushed to mid-term elections in 1998 and the political Hindutva people emerged with renewed strength. This time the NDA government lasted 13 months and fell after it was defeated on the floor of the house in a no-confidence motion by a single vote. The electorate, pushed into the third election in two years, was sick of the political nautankis being enacted in Delhi and they voted NDA into power with a clear majority. That is how political Hindutva found its first foot-hold in national politics - not through kidnappings or beheadings.

Anyway, Salman Khurshid already knows these things – he was very much in the thick of it. Being a politician, he should also know that political Hindutva has to be defeated at the hustings which in turn requires him and other Congress leaders to come up with a coherent response. Portraying Rahul Gandhi as a true-blue Janeudhari Brahmin or hurling childish abuses may not cut the ice. On the contrary such tactics may only end up inadvertently playing into the hands of their opponents.

Instead of giving such dubious gyaan Salman Khurshid, pretty much at the end of his political career, should return to Farrukhabad, go to the grassroots and (re)build the liberal movement from the bottom-up. That could be his solid contribution towards strengthening the Congress party. All else is mere petulance.

Post a Comment

4 Comments

  1. In fact, political Hindutva is much more insidious since it seeks to legitimize its ideology and actions by projecting its electoral credentials. Boko Haram is naked fundamentalism whereas Hindutva is Muh me Raam bagal me chhuri kind. And why their journey ti power was difficult is because they had to work their way against a well-entrenched ideological framework of broad-minded secular fabric built painstakingly through the years by leaders of freedom struggle. Their whole project is to turn Hindus into a fundamentalist lot and hence was very difficult since Hindus have for centuries been an anti thesis of what the Hindutva project wants then to be. Let then stay on for 20 more years and see what they will become.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Salman Khurshid has a similar tendency as Salman Khan. He may also drink the wine and talk as Salman drunk and drive. Hindutva is inclusive in nature having no antagonism to other faiths, otherwise 82 percent Hindus would have thrown to others beyond boundaries. He has enjoyed his political life and win the political battles, not only basis of Muslims voters but Hindus too. We believe in secularism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stunned at the writers' ability to simplify the issue to their convenience!
    The headline mislead me into expecting some rationally; what emerged instead was political bashing!
    A good write up needs objectivity and balance, both missing sorely in this case.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Write for The Vidarbha Gazette!